Essayist and Critic William Deresiewicz delivered a lecture to the plebe class at the United States Military Academy at West Point in October 2009 concerning Solitude and Leadership. What follows is my condensed version of his key ideas:
… Solitude is one of the most important necessities of true leadership.
… (Generally when we) talk about training leaders (we mean) educating people who make a big name for themselves in the world, people with impressive titles,… People who make it to the top. People who can climb the greasy pole of whatever hierarchy they decide to attach themselves to.
But I think there’s something desperately wrong, and even dangerous, about that idea.
… Excellence isn’t usually what gets you up the greasy pole. What gets you up is a talent for maneuvering. Pleasing your teachers, pleasing your superiors, … Jumping through hoops. Getting along by going along. Being whatever other people want you to be… Not taking stupid risks like trying to change how things are done or question why they’re done. Just keeping the routine going.
We have a crisis of leadership in America because… for too long we have been training leaders who only know how to keep the routine going. Who can answer questions, but don’t know how to ask them. Who can fulfill goals, but don’t know how to set them. Who think about how to get things done, but not whether they’re worth doing in the first place.
What we don’t have, in other words, are thinkers. People who can think for themselves. People who can formulate a new direction —a new way of doing things, a new way of looking at things. People, in other words, with vision.
(Leaders) are required more than ever to be able to think independently, creatively, flexibly. To deploy a whole range of skills in a fluid and complex situation… People who know how to do more than follow orders and execute routines.
I can assure you from personal experience that there are a lot of highly educated people who don’t know how to think at all. What makes a thinker—and a leader—is (the ability to) think things through (and have) the confidence, the courage, to argue for ideas even when they aren’t popular. . (They have) moral courage, the courage to stand up for what they believe.
… True leadership means being able to think for yourself and act on your convictions. But how do you learn to do that? How do you learn to think? Thinking means concentrating on one thing long enough to develop an idea about it. Not learning other people’s ideas, or memorizing a body of information, however much those may sometimes be useful. Developing your own ideas. In short, thinking for yourself.
It means gathering yourself together into a single point rather than letting yourself be dispersed everywhere into a cloud of electronic and social input (instead of dealing with) the difficult and troubling questions that being human throws in your way.
It’s perfectly natural to have doubts, or questions, or even just difficulties. The question is, what do you do with them? Do you suppress them, do you distract yourself from them, do you pretend they don’t exist? Or do you confront them directly, honestly, courageously? If you decide to do so, you will find that the answers… can only be found within—without distractions, without peer pressure, in solitude.
“Finding yourself,” has acquired a bad reputation… (but you) need to find yourself just as much as anyone does, and the way to do it is work, solitary work. Concentration. Thinking for yourself means finding yourself, finding your own reality. Leadership means finding a new direction…
Solitude is the very essence of leadership. The position of the leader is ultimately an intensely solitary, even intensely lonely one. However many people you may consult, you are the one who has to make the hard decisions. And at such moments, all you really have is yourself.
I wholeheartedly recommend you read the full text of the lecture here. Deresiewicz argues that developing a strong sense of individual values, of thinking for ones self, is crucial to effective leadership even within the confines of a highly regimented system. He uses Conrad’s Heart of Darkness (the novel on which the movie Apocalypse Now is based) he points out how empty hierarchical systems can be when they are administered rather than led.
When we are at our best we are encouraging our Scouts to be confident, visionary leaders who think things through and have the moral courage to stand up for what they believe. They are with us for a few short but crucially formative years when we have the opportunity to help them set a course for their futures. This awesome responsibility demands that we, be thinking, compassionate, visionary leaders ourselves.
Great post Clarke!
Your last paragraph speaks volumes to me.
I truly enjoy reading your blog both the content and the comments (thanks guys!) help to inspire me on my Scouting journey.
“This awesome responsibility demands that we, be thinking, compassionate, visionary leaders ourselves.” Deep Clarke, very deep.
I’m not sure that’s me. I’m pretty sure those words apply to Lord Baden-Powell. That’s why I rely on him and his program. Which illustrates a point. We don’t all have to be presidents and graduates of West Point to latch onto those principles. The principles are embodied within the program itself. If I didn’t believe that I wouldn’t be here. I’m not that guy Deresiewicz is talking about. I am willing to follow that guy, but it’s not me.
Most of my Scouts aren’t that guy either, but they are learning to seek out and follow those guys who are that guy.
Throughout my career I’ve worked for some of those guys. Frank Washburn at Blue Ridge Assembly. Paul Morgan at Cypress Creek YMCA. Dan Wheatcroft at Heart of America Council. Dick Lyon at KSC. Ron Oates at Central Florida Council. Pastor Ron Meyr at Faith-Viera Lutheran Church. I have seen, and known true leadership. I’m not visionary. I’m slow, plodding and generally effective. But not visionary. I believe that the program of Boy Scouting can draw those traits (thinking/compassionate/visionary) out of young men as they transition through the program under the trained/qualified guidance of men who may be less than visionary.
Is every professor at West Point a famous general? Are they all decorated soldiers? Have they all held elected office? Probably not. But they know the program and they know that when they follow the plan, goodness happens. Same for Scouting. Is every SM a famous Eagle Scout? Is every SM a CEO? Obviously not. For most of us our vision is the vision of Baden-Powell and James West. “Green Bar” Bill, Thomas Seton and Dan Beard. That vision guides us today. We know that when we follow the plan, goodness happens.
Don’t sell yourself short – lots of other folks rely on the program too but they don’t get the vision. One point of the lecture is that effective leaders aren’t always the most well known. When people like yourself think and understand the vision you become one of those transformative leaders.