Moderation
Haven’t we all participated in conversations about the way “THE COUNCIL” or “THE GOVERNMENT” or “THE COMPANY” spends money, earns money, wastes money and generally does what does?
Something deep in humanity in general, at the heart of the American way of government, and suffused in our culture is an abiding suspicion that:
Those in power (or seeking power) are at least part rascally, unworthy, dense and probably patently dishonest (unless they are my friends or I voted for them).
Public or private groups spend and account for money irresponsibly.
The certainty that ‘I would do a better job than those idiots if they would only listen to me.’
Often tiresome and counterproductive open discussion and dissent are important virtues.
Every organization needs vigilant naysayers, watchdogs, ombudsmen, auditors and reporters to perpetually question those in power. It is a vital responsibility of citizenship.
Naturally there will also be gossips, kibitzers, whiners, habitual complainers and the permanently disgruntled to sap the air out of the room as they obfuscate good oversight and debate with their disjointed rants.
Responsible citizens, employees and leaders talk reasonably and avoid heated argument whenever possible.
Experience teaches there are two or more sides to every question. Once in the driver’s seat of a company, a council, a government, a troop, a pack, a family we value moderation, clarity of purpose and reason.
Mistrust equally those who pat you on the head and says all is well and those who ask you to join the mob storming the castle with torches and pitchforks.